Amid the current financial crisis, there has been one equity index beating all others: the Shanghai Composite. Our analysis of this main Chinese equity index shows clear signatures of a bubble build up and we go on to predict its most likely crash date: July 17-27, 2009 (20%/80% quantile confidence interval).
Monday, July 13, 2009
The Chinese Equity Bubble: Ready to Burst (NOW)
Amid the current financial crisis, there has been one equity index beating all others: the Shanghai Composite. Our analysis of this main Chinese equity index shows clear signatures of a bubble build up and we go on to predict its most likely crash date: July 17-27, 2009 (20%/80% quantile confidence interval).
Posted by Piotr Chwiejczak at 7:44 PM 0 comments
Labels: Bubble burst, China, log periodic power law bubbles
Saturday, July 11, 2009
Larry Summers on EMH
In today’s Financial Times you can find an interesting interview with Larry Summers, director of the US president’s National Economic Council. A quote:
The chief intellectual casualty of the current crisis has been the “efficient markets” school – the theory, associated with such erstwhile laisser faire gurus as Alan Greenspan, that market participants are governed by rational expectations and markets are self-correcting. As an academic economist, Summers has studied the shortcomings of that approach but, working on Wall Street gave him, he says, a more visceral understanding of the “self-referential” character of markets: “Markets are concerned with the ultimate health of economies and the like but they’re equally or more concerned with what the likely judgments of other market participants in the short run are.”
I’m not quite sure whether Mr. Summers is aware that he is proposes to extend economists tool box with non-equilibrium models. Nevertheless it may indicate that non-equilibrium models are silently leaking into main stream of economics. Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH)has been falsified many times but I hope that this time it will be replaced by hypothesis better explaining how the market works. I think that G.Soros Reflexivity idea or MIT Andrew Lo Adaptive Market Hypothesis are good candidates to replace EMH for good. Read More......
Posted by Piotr Chwiejczak at 12:08 PM 0 comments
Labels: crises, Larry Summers, non-equlibrum models
Wednesday, July 8, 2009
Asset price misalignments and the role of money and credit
Tuesday, July 7, 2009
Poland then(30's) and now(00's)
This chart is from Barry Eichengreen and Kevin O’Rourke column comparing today’s global crises to the Great Depression. Although the general conclusion of the comparison is rather grim (i.e. no signs of green shoots in hard data) but Poland in that comparison is doing relatively well. The fall in the industrial output is relatively soft. What is than the receipt for success? I think Poland is weathering the storm so well (in relative terms) because of several factors : 1) Underdeveloped banking system 2) less leverage 3) smaller gaps /macro imbalances 4) regulations/constrains for domestic households to borrow in foreign currencies. Only if Poland would use good times (2005-2007) to reform state budged then it could be a clear winner of the crises
Posted by Piotr Chwiejczak at 10:08 AM 0 comments
Labels: financial crisis, industral output, Polnad
Friday, July 3, 2009
S&P 500 - critical time
It is fair to say that the global economic system is one of the most complex systems known in the biosphere. Compared to physics, economics differs in the important fact that the basic constituents, or “particles”, are already quite complex: human beings. So macroeconomic knowledge is insufficient tool to predict market trends as not only hard data are important but also how human beings think about macroeconomic reality.
John Maynard Keynes made a famous observation that much of individual economic behavior is due to “animal spirits” rather than long-term rational calculus so beloved by economic theorists and fundamental analysts.
That’s why I don’t want here to discus macroeconomic picture (i.e most recent US job readings) because it’s rather trivial task as we are still in negative feedback process (i.e. banks continue to tighten credit standards –> less credit available means lower demand -> lower demand means higher unemployment -> higher unemployment undermines creditworthiness -> banks continue to tighten credit standards etc)
What I would like to focus here on fact that series generated by some complex systems (i.e. financial markets ) are characterized by periodic or nearly periodic behavior. In these cases, the dynamics can be characterized by scaling laws. Such dynamics are usually denoted as fractal or multifractal, depending on the question if they are characterized by one scaling exponent or by a multitude of scaling exponents. Sierpinski gasket is one fine example of fractal
Some times its necessary to conduct series of tests to find the scaling factor but in case of S&P 500 the self similar pattern is clear at the first glance.
I simply repeat the analysis which I done last year and I got very similar scaling factor 2.7. In words it may indicate that S&P 500 is around critical time and that in August we may test the March lows.